Well. This book was a trial. Depressingly for me, I sensed that it had sufficient merit that I couldn\’t merely throw it aside in frustration and find a less energy-shredding book to review. So after at least two weeks trying to finish reading it, I succeeded. I\’m going to explain the bad bits first, then tell you why I bothered finishing this book and why it may still be worth your read despite the bad bits.
The First Third Or So, or \”Augh Whyyyyyyyy\”
First, and most importantly, this book\’s primary author is a medical doctor. This is important because most understandings of autism consider it a strictly mental disability/difference. It is, therefore, generally the realm of psychologists, psychiatrists, and other professionals that have an education in psychology. The people that wrote this book? Clearly either fell asleep during those classes or never took them in the first place.
That does not mean what they have to say is not relevant or correct… but it did nearly cause me to pop a vein in my forehead when they misrepresented no less than three major schools of thought in psychology, and in the same breath implied they were all basically the same (and useless). As a person with a degree in psychology, I am regularly disgusted by abuses of psychology in advertising, in politics, and in company policies. I tend to expect better of educated professionals.
In brief, for your edification or if you read this book. Freudian psychology is based in understanding and delving into the subconscious, and involves things like dream interpretation, free-association, and psychoanalysis. The man was a genius, but in a great many cases, he was also extremely misguided. Very few of his techniques are used today for lack of effectiveness.
Humanistic psychology, or what this book calls \”Be Yourself\” psychology, was introduced in the 60s. It is focused on the wholeness of the person, the inherent human drive towards self-actualization, and mindfulness. It involves non-judgemental listening, guided insights on the part of both therapist and client, and a very positive outlook and mindset.
Equating the two schools of thought is flatly wrong, and insulting to both of them and psychology itself to boot. That entire section, frankly, tastes like the authors\’ best attempts to push you away from psychology at any cost. There were many such breezy, poorly-researched thoughts in the first third of the book, and they drove me absolutely batty.
Another really awful bit was one of the very few citations in the book. It\’s already somewhat problematic, these days, to write a book on a new theory in which you do not cite your sources… but these authors had the gall to actually cite Andrew Wakefield as a reliable source. They even refer to him as \”Dr. Wakefield\” which he is not, any more. He is not a doctor, for the exact same reason that his name is mud in most autism circles: he published a paper (and held a press conference) effectively saying that the MMR vaccine causes autism. It was thereafter found that not only did his own research not support this conclusion, but also Wakefield had been paid money by prosecuting lawyers against the MMR vaccine. In short, Wakefield was corrupt, abused his doctorate, and fabricated claims regarding his research.
The end result of all this was that Wakefield was stripped of his doctorate, his paper was redacted from the magazine that published it, and his research was shown, over and over, to be false. Calling him \”Dr. Wakefield\” in this book, and implying that any of his work should be taken seriously, is not only incorrect, but flatly irresponsible.
Perhaps most insulting to me personally, this book and its authors are very fond of using phrasing like \”recovering from autism\” and \”reversing autism.\” If you\’re at all familiar with the neurodiversity movement, you\’ll know immediately how utterly insulting such phraseology is. They may as well have said \”cure autism\” and \”fix autism\” while they were at it, and taken the appropriately leveled firestorm that comes with such thoughtless word choice.
Like many books of this kind, this book is directed towards parents, in particular, parents who are desperate to \”make the autism go away.\” The easiest mentality to adopt, upon being told one\’s child is autistic, is to blame the autism for everything about your kid that\’s not normal and is bad. And then seek a cure for it, so you can have your dreams of your child\’s future back. I get this. But it is kind of insulting when someone essentially says, \”Oh God, I\’ll do anything to make my kid not like you.\” I\’m definitely not a perfect person and I certainly have challenges, but I don\’t think anyone appreciates being looked upon with a mixture of horror and pity.
Finally, the first third of so of this book, the \”stories of these kids and their treatments\” that are meant to resonate with parents reading the book… they either end before the child transitions to adulthood, or they end in death to promote the seriousness of seeking proper treatment. And each and every one of these stories tastes like pop psychology and abuse of persuasion methods. Had the whole book been like this, I would have been very inclined to burn the dratted thing rather than return it to the library…
The Not-Terrible Part of the Book
Each of the four categories of treatment is described in detail, including a number of options inside each category. Diet, for example, doesn\’t merely cover gluten-free/casein-free, but also contains options for specific food allergies, anti-yeast, anti-hypoglycemia, etc. Supplementation and medication are naturally very lengthy sections. I\’m pretty sure my eyes glazed over about halfway through the medication section, because I have no experience with any of it and there was so much information. But I can pretty much be sure this book would make a handy guide when approaching your doctor about ways to improve your kid\’s life.