book review

The Loving Push: How Parents and Professionals Can Help Spectrum Kids Become Successful Adults, by Temple Grandin and Debra Moore, is a book geared around teaching parents how to support their kids into adulthood.  The transition from child to adult can be particularly difficult for autistic and other neurodiverse people, especially when you mix in disability.

The typical story that comes up in the parent support group I attend is a \”failure to launch\” type story.  The child has some disability, but could probably live independently or elsewhere, with some supports.  Due to numerous setbacks and the utter inability of minimum wage to support that lifestyle, though, these people are typically living at home with their parents, and have no plans to move out.  They may even feel like they\’re incapable of managing life on their own, and expect their parents to handle that aspect of their lives forever.

Of course, no parent lives forever.  Nor does every parent feel okay with this lack of boundaries and the child\’s lack of independence.  So while some of these parents let the situation slide for decades, eventually it all ends the same place: \”we can\’t do this any more.\”  Efforts might be made to nudge the child onward towards making a life for themself, but depending on how things have gone, it can be an uphill battle.

Hence, this book.  Its information is backed up with real stories from autistic young adults, their parents, and their friends/support staff/professionals.

In reading this book, I suspect that most of the information presented is useful for any kind of kid (or adult child, as some people call grown children that still rely on their parents).

• Neurotypical children may not have singular special interests that they\’re intensely focused on, but if you want to teach effectively or motivate someone, you still incorporate the things they\’re interested in.  
• Neurodiverse children of all kinds may run into similar barriers, such as repeated rejections, learned helplessness, depression, anxiety, and addiction.  
• Perfectionism and addiction (regardless of what kind it is) are poisonous to learning and growing, regardless of your neurology.  Autistic people may be more prone to Internet/gaming addiction than most, but there are many kinds of addiction, including TV, drugs, and codependency (always sacrificing your own health and wellbeing to help others.)  
• Responsibility, chores, and life skills like cooking, cleaning, and laundry are important for all humans, regardless of IQ, neurology, etc.  While a person confined to a wheelchair or mobility device may not be able to reach the high cabinets, they can still learn to cook or garden or do laundry if given the right tools and teaching methods. 

Read This Book If

Go Wild: Eat Fat, Run Free, Be Social, and Follow Evolution\’s Other Rules for Total Health and Wellbeing, by John J. Ratey and Richard Manning, is thankfully a lot less gimmicky than it sounds.  After reading Spark a couple weeks ago, I approached this book with substantial dread, but it reads a lot more clearly than its predecessor.  This one was written for a lay audience, and it\’s so much more coherent as a result.  In this sub-300-page book, the authors describe a lifestyle, or perhaps a philosophy, for living a happier, healthier life. 

While autism is only mentioned in passing here and there in the chapters, it\’s been noted that autistic people function as the \”canary in the coal mine\” in terms of problems… in short, we\’re the first to suffer when things are systemically wrong, and we tend to suffer more than most people do.  Alternative lifestyles are much more commonplace in the autism community, including the very common dairy-free/gluten-free restriction which has helped so many of us thrive, rather than simply survive.

There are seven points of change or improvement that they address, as well as some failings of modern life and what the human lifestyle used to be like.  For each of his points (obvious things like sleep and food, but also a section on tribe/sociability and your central nervous system), they back up the ideas with references to research as well as personal stories.  I say references because the actual citations are not in evidence.  Not even at the end of the book in the horrifying mishmash of fine text that usually accompanies such things. 

This lack of citations is a little concerning, but I feel that to most readers, it doesn\’t make that much of a difference whether the citations are there or not.  Few people have time and inclination to hunt down every cited reference to be very sure it\’s accurate and appropriate to the text.  I\’d personally be happier with the references at the end, but there is enough information in each chapter to look up the scientists or research in question.  Assuming a certain level of Google-fu (know-how with a search engine), I guess. 

The ideas in the book flowed fairly logically, given the evidence presented and my own experiences with the various topics.  Mostly, the thoughts put forth were expansions of stuff my doctor has already been telling me, though a bit more explicit or more thoroughly described.  There were a couple surprises, such as the section that covers (but is definitely not limited to) meditation, and parts of the section on food.  There were also some interesting thoughts about cancer and asthma in the chapter on civilization and its results.

If anyone was wondering, no, this book does not tell you to quit your life, go into some extremely rural area, and live off the grid.  The authors aren\’t so obtuse as to think that\’s reasonable for their readers.  They do suggest basic changes in the modern lifestyle that, while difficult in some cases, are doable.  And if they work as advertised, definitely worth the effort. 

The authors are also smart enough to realize that lives are highly individualized.  Thus, in the final chapter they give you a framework with which to start your journey towards a happier, healthier you, but don\’t give you precise numbers, specific exercises, or a list of meals you can or can\’t have.  They give you basic suggestions, which you can use to try things and find what works for you.

Read This Book If

You\’re someone looking for better wellness for yourself or your loved ones.  This is a great read for the new year, honestly.  It\’s particularly relevant for those of us with less stable bodies and minds (like myself), whether that\’s autism, ADHD, depression, anxiety disorders, or something else entirely.  I\’m fairly certain neurotypical and mostly-healthy people will also find food for thought in these pages.  

Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain, by John J. Ratey (MD) with Eric Hagerman, is a deep dive into the idea that the human body is meant to move.  It explores this old wisdom with new science, explaining even into the chemical names and functions of how our body works.

This is a lengthy-feeling book, and it\’s not written for a general audience. Instead, it\’s written for fellow academics and professionals… which is to say, the whole book is one giant textwall, with chapters.  So while the knowledge in this book is valuable, I can\’t actually recommend it for general reading.  Instead, I\’ll do my best to lay out what subjects are covered in the book, and you can, if you wish, buy the book or borrow it from the local library and read the relevant sections.

So first, the book talks about students and learning.  There\’s a school in Illinois that has implemented exercise every day before classes, which set off the \”spark\” the book is named for.  The result was healthier students, feeling better about themselves, and most relevantly to the school system: improved grades.  The author talks about chemicals that are released when your heartrate is elevated and your muscles are working. 

Then he talks about stress, and how a little stress is good but too much is bad, and the specifics of those mechanics.  Then the book continues on to a section on anxiety, and some of the doctor\’s work with clients suffering anxiety, and how movement can reduce or replace the need for medicine.  Same with the section on depression, except that he doesn\’t recommend replacing your medication, but supplementing it with exercise. 

After these, the book moves onto conditions one might not otherwise associate exercise with.  There\’s a section for ADHD, and the author notes that he himself has ADHD and marks some personal experiences he\’s had regarding that and movement.  Then the next section is on addiction, and the next on hormones, and finally, aging. 

He ends the book with some general recommendations for brain and body health, noting that there is no \”one true exercise plan for brain and body health\” for all people that might ever want to benefit from this knowledge.  Your age, type of exercise activities preferred, mental health, and other challenges are relevant when developing a plan for yourself. 

Read This Book If

The Partner\’s Guide to Asperger\’s Syndrome, by Susan Moreno, Marci Wheeler, and Kealah Parkinson, is pretty much what it says: a book that tackles the challenges that may be faced by couples where one partner is autistic.  The scope of the book is somewhat limited in that it focuses intently on male autistic partners with female often highly socially-proficient neurotypical partners.  They acknowledge their advice here is limited to that situation, and autistic-autistic partnerships or female-autistic partners with male NT partners may have different situations to handle.

That said, some of the advice given here was broadly applicable regardless of the partnership composition.  There are certain tendencies addressed in this book that often apply to autistic people.  In many cases, these were exaggerated version of traits I sometimes display myself but could clearly see why they were painful to the neurotypical spouse or partner.  This similarity made the book rather painful for me personally to read, but I expect it would be rather enlightening for people who don\’t have an innate understanding of these behaviors.

Included sections are things like differences in communication, social skills, executive function, sensory processing issues, how to cope with stress, parenting, and common situations a NT spouse may find themselves in.  All included sections seemed highly relevant to the book\’s overall message.  The authors even attempted to give the book some balance by including a \”positives and negatives\” chapter about autistic traits.

I appreciated this effort to present the strengths an autistic partner can bring to a relationship, but I feel that overall the book focused intently on our deficiencies.  I felt rather sad and like I\’m a broken human as I read the book, matching some of my tendencies to the stories of dysfunction in various real and fictitious relationships described in the book.

I feel like this wasn\’t really the authors\’ intent, and it\’s possible I\’m being oversensitive on the subject.  After all, this is a book to help NT partners handle communication breakdowns and manage living with someone very different than oneself… it\’s not a book celebrating fully functional relationships that have few problems.

My sadness aside, the book had valuable (if rather brief) information on all the subjects it addressed.  I would suggest this as a starting point for a partner, and then to follow up on specific questions and subjects.  Like, if the autistic partner has severe rigidity, there might be specialized resources for that.  Or they might have touch sensitivity but not visual or sound sensitivity, so you might look into a book or expert who knows a lot about that subject.

The last thing that struck me about this book is that it strongly recommends finding three therapists: one for the autistic partner, one for the NT partner, and a relationship counselor for the relationship or marriage.  The authors also caution the NT partner to find a therapist that understands autism, because otherwise their concerns may be waved away as being a worry-wort or being overbearing.  I have no personal experience on the matter, but I can definitely see something like this happening, and I wouldn\’t wish it on anyone.

Read This Book If

The Autistic Brain: Thinking Across the Spectrum, by Temple Grandin and Richard Panek, is a book that explains the research, progression of thought, and advancement of autistic people over the time the primary author, Temple Grandin, has been alive.  This book is about six years old, so while it doesn\’t have the latest research, it\’s still valuable in terms of the discussion and overview.

Dr. Grandin is a voracious reader and a scientist, so she\’s kept abreast of research as it\’s developed over time.  Fortunately for parents and non-scientists everywhere, she\’s been able to write in terms that laypeople can understand.  Rather than make her readers sort through overcomplicated word choice, abundant acronyms, and obfuscation of ideas, she simply outlines the major research focuses, discusses them, and then discusses the \”what next.\”

This is a two part book: past thinking and research is part 1.  It began with a summary of the history of autism, followed by a section on brain scans, then genetics and DNA, and then sensory sensitivities.  Each subject is discussed in enough detail to give you a clear picture of what\’s happened in that area.

The second half the book is more philosophy and building on the past research and ideas.  It\’s the \”now what?\” that followed the \”where we\’ve been.\”  Again, all of this is quite approachable and readable for a layperson, which I\’m particularly appreciating after having to read so many words in scientific writing style.

The most notable section to me in this book was near the end, where Grandin discusses autistic thinking and strengths.  In a past book, she theorized that autistic people think in pictures.  She herself does that, after all.  The thing is, I don\’t.  At least, I mostly don\’t.

I think in some absurd combination of concepts, music, flavors, pictures, patterns, and words.  Grandin revisits this idea in this book, and corrects her initial assumption.  She now theorizes at least three types of thinkers.  While I still don\’t think I\’m any of these theorized thinker types, I appreciate that she\’s willing to correct her mistake and rethink her ideas.

Mind you, I still think she has a ways to go, but in truth, I\’m not sure I\’d do much better in her place.

Read This Book If

Asperger\’s and Girls, by Tony Attwood, Temple Grandin, and a bunch of other experts, is a book of essays on specific issues and specialized focuses on topics that come with being born with two X chromosomes and autism.  At the end, it includes a trio of essays by autistic authors, which help put the information from the previous chapters into context.  There are thoughts and guidance on the differences we\’ve seen between male and female autistic people, on sex education and puberty, on navigating the social life of a school, on transitioning to adult life from school, and even pieces on careers, relationships, dating, marriage, and motherhood.

The book is from 2006, so it\’s unfortunately a bit dated.  You wouldn\’t think that much could change in 13 years, but it can!  At that time, it was news that autistic people could be female, and everyone and their sister didn\’t own a smartphone.  Hence, there was a strong need for this book.  Fortunately, the general knowledge of autism has increased.  Possibly less fortunately, or at least very differently, the way kids learn about some of these subjects has changed. For example, never mind school sex ed or even proactive parental teaching, most likely the first place kids learn about sex is via the Internet, either from porn sites or (preferably!) from helpful online resources like this, this, and this.  Even so, the book still contains a good bit of useful advice and insight on the subjects it addresses.

Of particular interest was the section on social groups, how to fit in, how to navigate the school\’s social hierarchy, and the model of relationship levels.  This was information I was definitely missing when I grew up, and while I didn\’t entirely agree with every sentence in the essay, I probably am not the greatest resource for this information anyway.  I spent most of school as a loner (which I was just fine with), and only had an actual friend group in high school.  I must have done okay by them, or at least tolerably, but I can\’t imagine I was anyone\’s Friend #1.

The section I had the most disagreements with was also one of the most important and useful sections: the one on puberty.  In 2006, the culture was beginning to shift, but wasn\’t yet to the point of understanding Consent, or recognizing that while you don\’t just… talk about menstruation or sex with strangers, they\’re also not subjects you should be ashamed of, and it\’s okay to talk about them with your close friends. Or… I guess random strangers in a supportive Internet environment like Scarleteen (All hail the mighty Internet, where you can sidestep your embarrassment on a subject by being anonymous).

At the time this book was written, I was in high school, and these things were beginning to change… but consent was still poorly understood.  And in fact, it\’s mentioned in this book, but not by that name, and certainly not discussed in detail, like the difference between \”no means no\” and \”yes means yes.\”  The book even counsels not talking about having a period, as if it\’s impolite to mention this basic fact of life and people will faint if it\’s brought up.  Maybe it\’s that I\’m autistic, but I personally think if you can\’t handle hearing that a person is suffering cramps or needs to use the bathroom to change their pad, you need to grow up.

A minor concern about this section was the espousing of disposable pads.  I know disposable pads and tampons are easy and convenient and all that, but they\’re incredibly expensive over time, environmentally unfriendly, and there are perfectly good reusable options for both products.  I would rather autistic girls (and all girls, really) be taught how to use these reusable options, and only rely on disposable products for emergencies.  In all honesty, the disposable pads are scratchy and annoying by comparison to the washable ones anyway.

Still, the essay is quite right in telling you to start teaching body changes, cleanliness, use of hygiene products, sex ed, and personal safety.  And not only to teach it outside school, but teach it early, and in steps rather than all at once.

Read This Book If

You want a general overview of the ways autism can be experienced differently in women and girls, and don\’t mind that some of the recommendations and information are outdated.  Teachers, parents, and even some professionals could really benefit from the information here.  In particular, I appreciated that the book didn\’t shy from talking about and instructing you how to teach about menstruation, body changes, and sex.  I really wish Future Horizons (the publisher) would update this book for the Information Age.  A discussion of consent would be an excellent addition to the book.  Regardless, it was a valuable read, especially since, even 13 years later, some people still insist on thinking autism is mainly a condition that guys have.

Extra: Resources for Women

https://www.reddit.com/r/aspergirls/

https://www.aane.org/women-asperger-profiles/

https://awnnetwork.org/

Life with a Partner or Spouse with Asperger Syndrome: Going over the Edge? by Kathy J. Marshack, is a book on handling relationship difficulties when one partner is autistic.  It\’s written by a therapist with personal experience in autism.  She\’s nonspecific, to protect privacy, but my guess is that in addition to having an autistic mother, she also married and then divorced an autistic man.  I\’ll just be very polite and say, \”it shows.\”

I try not to look up reviews by others before I read and review a book myself, because it tends to bias my understanding of the book and the author.  This particular book made me very angry within the first couple chapters, though.  I mentioned this to a friend, and he looked up the reviews… apparently a lot of autistic people got angry about this book.

I did find some redeemable points about it, though, so I\’m still going to review it.  It\’s just going to get a more critical treatment than most of what I read, because there were some very serious issues.

First and foremost, the author.  I mentioned her background with autistic family members.  This book seems like something the author wrote as part of her personal therapy.  It\’s very raw and painful at points, something like Lament for a Son, except destructive towards autistic people in parts, and written from a place of authority (PhD/therapist/marriage counselor).

The combination is rather horrifying to me.  Lament for a Son is an excellent book, written by a grieving father who claims no particular understanding of life and death.  As a marriage counselor and earner of a PhD, though, the author sits in the position of authority for the majority of this book… which, given what I\’ll mention next… is kind of hackles-raising.

The biggest point of contention I have with this book and its author is that, while sitting in that position of authority, they refer to autistic people as broken, and seem to imply that the autism is the failure point of these relationships.  Things like \”being incapable of empathy.\”  (Easy example on page 20: \”But what all those with Asperger\’s seem to have in common is the effect they have on their loved ones.  Because they are not able to empathize, they often leave us feeling alone or crazy…\”)

Not able to empathize.  Not able?  Being autistic does not mean you lack empathy.  In fact, quite the opposite.  Nor does being neurotypical mean you\’re perfect at communication and have healthy expectations for people and relationships.

I\’ve been told by a former roommate from college that she\’d assumed I had no empathy, presumably because she\’d been told that absurd factoid elsewhere.  She never questioned it until years later.  She didn\’t question it when I bought Easter candy and hid it around her room in a little Easter egg hunt.  Didn\’t question it when I made time to listen to her when she was upset or wanted company.  Didn\’t even question it when I put together music from her home church to go with her on a longer trip overseas, to help fight the homesickness while she was gone.

It was only years later, when it came up in conversation, because this kind of thing is my work, that she realized the assumption and told me about it.  It was, frankly, really hurtful.  It\’s been battered into me, while growing up, that I\’m a wrong and terrible and broken, not simply \”different.\”  This friend is not a stupid person, and has plenty of empathy herself.  But she\’d been fed that assumption and never thought to question it.  So to her, I was broken.

Needless to say, I hope, it makes me alllll kinds of white-hot furious to see that embittered, heartless, flatly wrong assumption parroted again, here, from a place of a marital counselor with a PhD.  If my copy wasn\’t a library book, I would have burned it on the spot for that vicious cruelty alone.

Once and for all, people: Autistic people have empathy.  We think and behave differently than the norm, which can mean we don\’t recognize a situation where empathy is appropriate, or which actions are desired upon recognizing situation that would merit an action.  The safest move, when not knowing what to do, is usually to do nothing.  An autistic person may also miss that a situation is upsetting to a neurotypical person, and thus be blindsided by requests for comfort, help, or a change in behavior (or in this book\’s case, the lack of requests, which grows into relationship problems…).

Second point: relationships are hard.  You don\’t need autism in the mix to have massive communication failures.  Half of all marriages in the US end in divorce.  Half.  That is far too many for it to be \”autism ruins everything.\”  For all this book\’s insistence that neurotypical norms and expectations are reasonable (and autistic ones aren\’t?), they often aren\’t reasonable at all.  If they were, the divorce rate wouldn\’t be so high.  The author may specialize in marriage counseling for people with autism or married to someone with autism, but at least in this book, they place far too high a value on normalcy.  Sometimes personalities clash.  Sometimes expectations shift.  Sometimes situations change.  And sometimes, people can\’t reconcile those changes.  That\’s life.

Before I married my spouse, we had some serious talks about lifetime type issues.  Kids, chores, balance of responsibilities, etc.  We had pre-marital counseling.  We had fights about things, from important stuff like \”who does what chores when and how often\” to \”does the toilet seat stay up or stay down?\”  I\’m autistic.  I have trouble communicating.  That makes this whole relationship thing harder.  I try to help counter it by laying out my expectations and trying to hear his expectations.  Talking about our differences.  Putting our compromises on paper, and then trying to stick to them.

Y\’know who apparently didn\’t do this?  The main example people, \”Helen\” (NT wife) and \”Grant\” (autistic husband).  The author goes on and on about Grant\’s controlling personality, his preoccupation with work, and the painful situations that result.  Not so much in focus?  Helen\’s self-martyrization and apparent inability to tell her spouse what she wants from him.  She can tell her therapist just fine, right up to and including \”isn\’t it so crazy that he doesn\’t just do this already?\”  But apparently it would be beyond the pale to actually, I don\’t know, use those vaunted neurotypical communication skills to communicate those things?

I\’m extremely unimpressed with either of them.  Helen needs to quit running herself ragged, making excuses for her spouse, acting the martyr, and staying quiet about what things she needs from Grant, emotionally.  Grant needs to detach from work to spend time with his family, learn a bit about neurotypical-handling, take his spouse and her concerns seriously, and learn more appropriate behaviors in the various situations he fails at in this book.  This morass of a situation described in this book doesn\’t need to happen, and certainly doesn\’t need to continue.

Third point: the book counsels \”detachment\” as an answer to relationship problems with an autistic spouse.  Detachment: distancing yourself from the situation and your spouse.

Y\’know what that is?  It\’s the Fourth Horseman of Broken Relationships.  Seriously, I cannot stress enough that you should not do this unless you see zero hope for success in the relationship.

I read the whole book, and the author seems to slowly redefines \”detachment\” as \”not taking your spouse\’s autism-related failings/behaviors personally\” and \”redefining your expectations for your partner and yourself.\”  That is not how English works, and it strikes me as a very dangerous path to take.  Especially, as mentioned, when speaking as a marital counselor.

There\’s a chapter on sex, too, which of course places autism as the point of failure when a NT spouse feels unfulfilled, unromanced, etc.  Let\’s talk about this for a moment.

Popular culture has a lot of messages for us about how sex should be.  The focus is pretty much always on penis-haver.  As the owner of female parts, I learned basically nothing about them, what to do with them, or how to experience pleasure with them.  To be blunt and uncouth, pop culture, sex ed class, and porn instructed me that my parts are only for being a cocksleeve, and my sexual pleasure is irrelevant.

Is it any wonder, then, that couples have so much trouble with mutually-satisfying sex?  This isn\’t an autism thing, it\’s a cultural thing.  We\’re so uncomfortable talking about and portraying sex, that all you get are bare bones details unless you do some serious searching online and get lucky enough to find some of my generation\’s work on it.

This is all massively unhelpful for any relationship.  There\’s a huge industry around satisfying unfulfilled lovers with either anatomy, with everything from sex toys to self-help books to making infidelity faster and easier than ever before.

When it comes down to it, what you actually need is for people to talk about their preferences in sex and intimacy, and be willing to try new things.  I have a friend (who is married to another vagina-haver), who tells me they pity straight couples.  In gay and lesbian relationships, there aren\’t so many norms, and it\’s basically required that you talk about what kinds of sex, touch, and intimacy you like.  Straight couples don\’t do that nearly as much, if at all, and the results of poor communication are… well, predictable.

In the end, everyone should talk about these things with their spouses.  Everyone should figure out what they like and don\’t, and give directions and follow directions.  Autistic people just need more directions than most.

The book seems to have an undercurrent of \”I can\’t believe autistic people can\’t see all these signals we put out\” even though it\’s stated repeatedly, that this is the truth.  It\’s as if the author can\’t entirely believe it herself.  It\’s also as if the author, despite being a marriage counselor, doesn\’t understand that even if the signals are put out, they aren\’t necessarily read correctly or at all by a neurotypical spouse, either.  Frankly, it boggles my mind.  If y\’all were the magical thought-reading genius-psychics this book seems to imply is normal, there wouldn\’t be so many divorces between purely NT partners.

Two quick notes before I move on.  First, this book has a section subtitled \”Can you be NT in an Aspie World?\”  This is an absurdity.  There is no Aspie world.  We are essentially aliens, strangers in a strange land.  There are only pockets in the vast NT world where autistic people may sometimes find respite to be ourselves.  Neurotypical people are the vast majority, and they shaped the world we live in.  Playing the victim because things aren\’t exactly as you\’d like them is worse than wrong, it\’s abusive.  Like we don\’t have enough to deal with.

Second, there\’s a small incident with a fictitious Justine (NT) and Edwin (autistic) having a minor argument.  Justine says to Edwin, \”You think other people should think like you, don\’t you?\”  He responds in the positive, and the book says, \”As long as Edwin has that point of view, there is no reason for Justine to argue another view.  She will lose.\”

I hate to shatter anyone\’s beautiful illusions here, but \”assuming other people think like you and that your way of thinking is best\” is literally the default human state.  That isn\’t an autistic thing.  It\’s a people thing.  What makes autistic people have so much more trouble with it is that we\’re so very different that it\’s much more of a stretch to imagine a \”normal\” viewpoint, transitioning between points of view can be difficult, and we\’re sometimes prone to black-and-white thinking.

I\’ve been pretty critical of this book thus far, and fairly so, in my opinion.  But I\’d be doing a disservice to the book and its author if I didn\’t point out that it gets some of its stuff right.  In general, the \”Lessons Learned\” bullet point section at the end of each chapter has the broad therapeutic brushstrokes correct.

Things like \”seek professional help from someone qualified,\” \”if your partner doesn\’t understand you, stop and explain yourself in simple and concrete details,\” and \”don\’t be offended if they miss your cues.  Be explicit.  Use words to explain your emotional state and your needs and wants…\”  The ugly accusations, like the supposed lack of empathy, supposed abusive tendencies, and blaming the autistic person or the autism itself for everything going wrong in a relationship, usually don\’t make it into these.  Usually.

This book is perhaps a good example of how marriages can go very wrong when autistic people are involved.  As a practicing marriage counselor, the author has seen lots of those, and the example couples seem more or less realistic.  In that capacity, it has value, and if your marriage woes resemble any of the examples\’ woes, then perhaps the book might be helpful.  If you can somehow shrug off all the other things I\’ve complained about.

Read This Book If

I try really hard to find redeemable points in a book, and if I find none, I don\’t write a review for it.  This book came to the bleeding edge of that limit.

I can see this book having value for someone who is very like the author, who I\’m guessing resembles her fictitious \”Helen\” in a lot more ways than she say directly.  People with an autistic spouse, prone to internalizing their marriage woes, rather than talking about them with their spouses, professionals, or even friends and family.  People prone to valuing the appearance of happiness, and sacrificing themselves and their needs and wants on the altar of self-martyrdom rather than admit that something\’s wrong and seek solutions.

For anyone else… find something else to read.

This book outright calls autistic people broken and incapable of empathy.  It seems to fight with itself as to whether we\’re the villains or to be pitied and helped.  Frankly, it reads like the author wants to have her cake and eat it too.  She still seems to have lot of feelings about her divorce and her autistic mother that, I would say, she put into her writing here.  But in this book, she writes as the authority, the therapist, the PhD, the person in the place of power and knowledge.  And while she does so, her bitterness poisons and twists the narrative and even the therapeutic recommendations, destroying any good the book might have offered couples in need of help.  Find something else to read.  

Reframe You Thinking Around Autism: How the Polyvagel Theory and Brain Plasticity Help Us Make Sense of Autism, by Holly Bridges, is a very short (100 page) explanation of a new theory about autism.  It features easy-to-digest language, small doodle-like pictures for illustration, and small quotations/poetry interspersed throughout.

For a book devoted to explaining a scientific theory, it\’s remarkably readable.  It\’s meant to be, of course.  The entire point of the book is to explain, in layperson\’s terms, how a scientific theory (Polyvagel Theory) and a specific type of therapy (Anat Baniel Method) combine to form a complete understanding of autism and a path forward to helping an autistic person learn to thrive.  It\’s an explanation that doesn\’t rely on specific genetic markers, air pollution, or really any single \”cause\” for autism.  But it does offer paths forward for autistic people and their families.

I won\’t summarize the theory here, as that\’s the whole point of the book and it does it better than I would, but I do think the theory has merit.  I\’m not 100% sure it applies to every single person on the spectrum, but it very well could.  In particular, I found the explanation meshed well with some descriptions in \”my life with autism\” books I\’ve read, such as The Reason I Jump and Knowing Why.  It could even explain John Elder Robison\’s experience in Switched On.  In truth, my own improvements with LENS might be explained by this theory.

I don\’t have any major \”yes, this is exactly right!\” experiences that go with this book and the theory it espouses, but as I\’m considered \”better at camouflage,\” or \”high functioning\” (ugh), it might be safe to say I\’d be less affected by the systemic interference the theory suggests is the real reason for autistic behavior.  Or I might just be being characteristically dense and missing something that\’d be obvious to someone more acquainted with the theory.  It\’s very much a fish in water being asked what \”wet\” feels like, in some cases.

The book has an interesting take on the whole \”autistic people rub neurotypical people the wrong way\” phenomenon, which I appreciated.  I tend to have a very negative way of thinking about the whole thing, but the author wasn\’t quite so cynical, and it helps to see the interaction in multiple ways.  So that\’s a highlight I found useful. 

It wasn\’t a perfect book.  I\’m not sure I\’ve yet read a book I didn\’t have at least some minor disagreement with.  The author makes generalizations about autistic people and our development and preferences that I can pretty much guarantee aren\’t going to be true 100% of the time.  It\’s just a matter of people being all different, even within a single category (\”autistic people,\” \”black people,\” \”Australian people\”).

I was also thrown for a loop by the use of the word \”autist\” for \”autistic person\” but the author\’s Australian, so that may just be the lingo there.  It\’s not particularly offensive, I just wasn\’t particularly expecting it, so it stuck out.

Read This Book If

Disability and Inclusive Communities, by Kevin Timpe, is an overview of the history of disability, its historical treatment in the Bible, the United States, and in the Christian church.  It\’s published out of a local Christian college, making it a little harder to find than most of the books I\’ve reviewed, but there\’s still an Amazon link there for anyone interested. 

At 107 pages plus a few more of references, it\’s not a long read, but it is an important one.  It is, effectively, an overview of the exclusion of disabled people in the United States, and the various facets of that: social, legal, religious, interpersonal, and systemic. 

For a book ostensibly focused on inclusion, it spends a lot of its time talking about exclusion.  Fully half the chapters focus on various types of exclusion, which is perhaps fair given the world\’s general treatment of people with disabilities. This is a book that was definitely written by an academic, but it uses fairly simple language, making it more accessible than any other piece on the subject I\’ve seen. 

The book is full of self-aware touches like that.  The author is by far the most cautious writer I\’ve ever read on the subject.  He shares some of his family\’s story, because his son is autistic and also has some other differences and challenges.  But not too much, because he recognizes that his son\’s story is his son\’s to tell (or to not tell).  He\’s also wise enough to recognize that he, as a non-disabled person, isn\’t ideally suited to write about the subject… but also that somebody has to. 

The author also doesn\’t flinch about describing the exceptionally poor treatment the Christian church has historically (and all too often, recently) given disabled people.  The reasons for this are discussed, though not in overwhelming detail.  But he quite rightly points out that those reasons rely on an incomplete understanding of the New Testament.  The church is, of course, also inclined to take on the philosophies of the cultures it lives in, which in the US, means valuing youth and health above all. 

Of particular note to me was the section on US law, which gave both the history of disability civil rights, and the various iterations of laws around accommodations and education.  There isn\’t much on the subject and I was already aware of most of it, but it helps to have it all put together in line.  Really, the same goes for the Biblical understanding of disability.  I was familiar with most of what was discussed, but it had never been laid out plainly like this. 

In general, this book and its author were knowledgeable on the subjects they discussed.  The perspective was basically right on every point.  The author even went to the trouble of consulting with various people with disabilities, to try to be sure he was getting the full picture and being sensitive to the topic.  He didn\’t succeed 100% at getting every detail of that correct, but that\’s perhaps as much on his references as it is on him. 

The one thing I wasn\’t impressed with was the comparison between the Deaf community and the autism community.  While it is definitely true that some people in the autism community believe autism itself isn\’t a disability… the general consensus that I tend to see is rather: \”in a perfect world, we might not be disabled, but because that\’s not how it is, we are definitely disabled.\”  And of course there are people with sensory sensitivities who might consider themselves disabled even if the world was perfectly suited for autistic people. 

I suppose another point of criticism here is that the book doesn\’t really offer concrete suggestions for how to improve inclusion in a church or school.  Instead, it offers broad ideas, like \”listen to your disabled people.\”

Read This Book If

Mindful Living with Asperger\’s Syndrome: Everyday Mindfulness Practices to Help You Tune Into the Present Moment, by Chris Mitchell, is a guidebook on meditation and mindfulness specifically for autistic people, by an autistic person.  At less than 125 pages, it\’s a short read, which is nice.

The main of the book discusses mindfulness, how it\’s helpful for autistic people, why you might want to start practicing it, and then, how to practice it.  My attention as a reader was quickly drawn away from that by how hyperfocused the author was on the diagnosis.